Review and Criticism of Thomas Luckmann’s Theory of Invisible Religion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65394/dissertia2025.1.1.rcir

Keywords:

Lifeworld, Intersubjectivity, Invisible Religion, Social Construction of Reality, Phenomenology, Meaning-Making, Modernity

Abstract

This study examines the place of religion in modern societies and explains the mechanisms of its transformation by drawing on Husserl’s phenomenological thought alongside a reinterpretation of Thomas Luckmann’s sociological approach. It shows how Alfred Schutz introduced concepts such as the lifeworld, intersubjectivity, the constitution of consciousness, and mental representation into the sociology of religion, and how these concepts later became foundational to Luckmann’s analysis of “invisible religion.” Methodologically, the research relies on documentary analysis, theoretical critique, and conceptual analysis to explore the relationship between social structures and new forms of religious meaning-making. The findings indicate that religion in the modern era has neither disappeared nor remains exclusively identifiable through traditional institutions; rather, at an individual and privatized level, it continues to provide meaning. The study further argues that many criticisms of Luckmann’s theory of “privatization” stem from inattention to its conceptual foundations or from hasty generalizations. Ultimately, the research contends that careful attention to social and historical contexts enables the prediction of patterns of religious transformation across different societies. The contribution of this study lies in its critical re-reading of Luckmann’s approach and in highlighting its utility for understanding religion in the modern age.

Author Biographies

Samane Feyzi, Allameh Tabataba'i University

Researcher and Lecturer of Comparative Religions and Mysticism, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. Email: s.feizi66@gmail.com

Mahdi Hasanzadeh, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Associate Professor, Department of Comparative Religions and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Email: hasanzadeh@um.ac.ir

Behzad Hamidiye, University of Tehran

Assistant Professor, Department of Comparative Religions and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran. Email: hamidieh@ut.ac.ir

References

Beaney, Michael, and Thomas Raysmith. 2024. “Analysis.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/analysis/.

Berger, Peter L. 1990. A Rumor of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural. Expanded edition with a new introduction by the author. Anchor Books. ISBN: 9780385415927.

Berger, Peter L. 1990. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New edition. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN: 9780385073059.

Berger, Peter L. 1979. The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation. Anchor Press. ISBN: 9780385142861.

Davie, Grace. 2007. The Sociology of Religion. BSA New Horizons in Sociology. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9781446238851.

Luckmann, Thomas. 2022. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. Edited by Tom Kaden and Bernt Schnettler. Knowledge, Communication and Society. Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 9781000790184.

Roeland, Johan, Stef Aupers, Dick Houtman, Martijn de Koning, and Ineke Noomen. 2010. “The Quest for Religious Purity in New Age, Evangelicalism and Islam: Religious Renditions of Dutch Youth and the Luckmann Legacy.” In Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion, 82–102. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004187900.i-488.82.

Stark, Rodney. 2017. “Economics of Religion.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion, edited by Robert A. Segal, 47–66. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405168748.ch3.

Downloads

Published

17-11-2025

How to Cite

Feyzi, S., Hasanzadeh , M., & Hamidiyeh, B. (2025). Review and Criticism of Thomas Luckmann’s Theory of Invisible Religion. Dissertia Research Reviews, 1(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.65394/dissertia2025.1.1.rcir

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.