The Role of Culture as a Variable in Christian–Muslim Dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65394/dissertia2025.1.1.rcvdKeywords:
Christian–Muslim Dialogue, Culture and Religion, Ethnicity, Intercultural Communication, Interreligious StudiesAbstract
This article examines culture as a central analytical category in Christian–Muslim dialogue, addressing a significant gap in interfaith studies where theological commonalities often overshadow the formative role of cultural and ethnic differences. Recognizing the deep interrelation of religion and culture, the study argues that cultural configurations shape how beliefs are expressed, rituals performed, and sacred texts interpreted, thereby influencing both the possibilities and constraints of interreligious engagement. Using examples from diverse Christian and Muslim settings, the analysis demonstrates that variations in communicative style and interpretive expectation are frequently rooted in cultural divergences. The conceptual framework integrates Qur’anic perspectives with insights from Shiʿi thinkers ʿAllāmah Hasanzādah Āmulī and ʿAllāmah Shaʿrānī, who view religion as a comprehensive and identity-forming system. Edward Tylor’s classical definition of culture and Victor Kozlov’s model of ethnicity further clarify how cultural and ethnic identities intersect with religious belonging. Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action provides an additional lens for evaluating the conditions necessary for constructive intercultural dialogue. Institutional analyses of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, the World Council of Churches, and Iran’s Center for Interreligious Dialogue, along with case studies from Myanmar and Nigeria, reveal the decisive impact of cultural variables on dialogical outcomes. The study concludes that interfaith dialogue gains depth and effectiveness when cultural and ethnic contexts are explicitly acknowledged and incorporated into its design.
References
Abramson, Harold J. 1979. “Migrants and Cultural Diversity: On Ethnicity and Religion in Society.” Social Compass 26 (1): 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776867902600101.
Cornille, Catherine, ed. 2013. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Inter-Religious Dialogue. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Print ISBN 9780470655207. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118529911.
Greeley, Andrew M. “The Sociology of American Catholics.” Annual Review of Sociology 5 (1979): 91–111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2945949.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0807015075.
Kozlov, Viktor I. 1988. The Peoples of the Soviet Union. Translated by Pauline M. Tiffen. London: Hutchinson. ISBN 0091730333.
Moyaert, Marianne. 2011. Fragile Identities. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032804.
Pope Francis. 2015. “Interreligious Audience for 50th Anniversary of Nostra Aetate.” General Audience, St. Peter’s Square, Vatican City, October 28. Vatican.va. Accessed November 15, 2025. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/audiences/2015/documents/papa-francesco_20151028_udienza-generale.html.
Pratt, Douglas. 2009. “The World Council of Churches in Dialogue with Muslims: Retrospect and Prospect.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 20 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410802542110.
Pratt, Douglas. 2010. “The Vatican in Dialogue with Islam: Inclusion and Engagement.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 21 (3): 245–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2010.496656.
Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Vol. 2. London: J. Murray. ISBN 9781108017510.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahdi Salehi, Mehrab Sadeghnia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in Dissertia Research Reviews are published under the CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons License, which allows sharing, copying, distributing, and adapting the work, even for commercial purposes, provided proper credit is given. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
By publishing with Dissertia Research Reviews, authors agree that their work will be freely accessible worldwide, supporting open access, scholarly visibility, and wider academic exchange.